Skip to Content



Autonomous vehicles trajectories validation

« The level of safety to be ensured by automated/autonomous vehicles shall be at least equal to the one ensured by a competent and careful human driver. »

UNECE, WP.29/GRVA/2020/32 – “Revised Framework Document on Automated/Autonomous Vehicles”

Today

Regulation

Homologation and certification are crucial, but not sufficient to demonstrate the security of the autonomous vehicle trajectories.

Various criteria

A lot of security criteria exist to evaluate autonomous vehicle trajectories. There is a lack of a unique, explicable, physical criterion.

Massive simulation

Statistics over massive simulation is a costly answer. Problematic scenarios have still to be deeply analysed with the other criteria.


Going beyond regulations, with a physical severity X frequency analysis


configurable software to test different hypotheses


 
detailed and explainable analysis without massive computing
 

Our Solution

take into account the uncertainty about the future evolution of obstacles, and the limited capabilities of the vehicle, to deduce the worst-case scenario and the corresponding minimum impact speed. This velocity is the gravity of the risk.

Contact us

Products

PoCs

 Get the opportunity to adapt our solution to your needs.

Services

 Mobpti solution is based on the Mobpti library. With its Python API, this library can be used in risk analysis official or custom methods.